🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive attacks on freedom have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding placards opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, suffered and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.