🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.